Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:44

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Where should Jac Caglianone hit in the Royals order? - Royals Review
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
4 Ups & 5 Downs From WWE SmackDown (6 June - Results & Review) - WhatCulture.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What pleasure do guys get by sucking female breasts?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Shock as Republican plan will raise Americans' utility bills by hundreds a year - Alternet
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
China demands sensitive information for rare earth exports, companies warn - Financial Times
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.